Second order effects of the recession

Dan Frommer of Silicon Alley has noteworthy a post on start ups merging with each other.  It can't make sense for many start ups to merge with each other.  They are already stretched just keeping themselves going and executing on their own plans.  So, they are unlikely to have the bandwidth to take on a second project.  Hence there will be few synergies and fewer savings.  Unless the two start ups are more fundable when put together than they are apart, something is going to get mothballed.  This strategy suggests that one (maybe both) parties can't find a buyer, even in a distress sale.  Dan Frommer notes that Google "is waiting to buy companies until prices come down."  I wonder if  this strategy isn't just aimed at preserving or enhancing some value for a distress sale in the coming months.  if it is, I don't think we will see a lot of this activity because sellers have to have more options with a single product than trying to find a buyer (who may or may not) see the synergies of the two start ups together.  Presumably a buyer could put them both together itself if it was so inclined.

Comments (1)

Read through and enter the discussion by using the form at the end
Healy Jones - March 10, 2009 1:21 PM

Besides the usual "synergies," (which can really work in VC backed startups) there is another reason for this - CASH. A cash rich startup with a failed (ok, let's not say failed, but not quite yet market ready) business plan in a certain space may merge with a cash strapped startup making progress in the same industry. Or, a cash cow startup that has reached a plateau in revenue growth may merge with a cash-burning startup with growth potential in the same space.

Post a comment

Fill out this form to add a comment to the discussion
I'd like to leave a comment. is
,
is
,
is
is