<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>Emerging Enterprise Center Blog - Venture Perspectives</title>
      <link>http://www.emergingenterprisecenterblog.com/venture-perspectives/</link>
      <description>Boston Startup Lawyers &amp; Attorneys for Venture Capital &amp; Financing Entrepreneurs</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:31:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:31:48 -0500</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.32-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>New York and New England Q1 Venture Statistics -- a quick preview</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>We are about to publish our first review of New York transactions.&nbsp; Here is the sneak preview:&nbsp;</p>
<p>With respect to series A deals, New York and New England each had 22 deals in Q1.&nbsp; According to us, there were 223 series A deals nationally.&nbsp; So, NY and NE collectively represented approximately 20% of the national market.</p>
<p>With respect to later stage transactions, there were 25 NY deals and 43 NE deals.&nbsp; Again, according to us there were 368 deals nationally.&nbsp; So collectively NY and NE represent about 18% of the market.</p>
<p>I imagine that the relatively smaller number of later stage deals in New York reflects a number of things.&nbsp; One might be that the boom in NY deals is relatively recent so there may not be as many companies in the pipeline that are ready for a second or later round investment.&nbsp; Another might be that the mix of investment opportunities in New York is more &ldquo;capital efficient&rdquo; than in NE (and maybe other places).</p>
<p>With respect to that later point, here is a breakdown of some categories.&nbsp; We categorize deals into one of four categories technology, life science, cleantech and other.&nbsp;</p>
<p>With respect to series A deals in NE in Q1 40% of deals were in the technology category, 14% were in life science and the rest were other.&nbsp; That is there were no cleantech deals.&nbsp; In NY 30% were technology and 70% were other.&nbsp; There were no life science or cleantech deals.</p>
<p>With respect to later stage deals, in NE 37% were life science and 35% were technology.&nbsp; In NY 72% were other and 16% were technology.</p>
<p>I suspect that most of the other deals in NY were companies with revenue models based on advertising revenue.&nbsp;</p>
<p>All this leads to the conclusion that NY is a pretty exciting place for investors.&nbsp; I predict that the upswing in NY deals will continue.&nbsp; Stats over the next few quarters will tell the story.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.emergingenterprisecenterblog.com/activity-levels/we-are-about-to-publish/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emergingenterprisecenterblog.com/activity-levels/we-are-about-to-publish/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.emergingenterprisecenterblog.com/">Activity Levels</category><category domain="http://www.emergingenterprisecenterblog.com/">Funding</category><category domain="http://www.emergingenterprisecenterblog.com/">Tech Trends</category><category domain="http://www.emergingenterprisecenterblog.com/">Venture Perspectives</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:59:00 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dave Broadwin</dc:creator>

      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>February 2011 Issue</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Quarterly and Annual Review of Series A Financings and Series B/Later Round Financings: Q4 and Year 2010</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.emergingenterprisecenterblog.com/venture-perspectives/february-2011-issue/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emergingenterprisecenterblog.com/venture-perspectives/february-2011-issue/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.emergingenterprisecenterblog.com/">Venture Perspectives</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:42:09 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>

      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Nov 2010 Issue</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Quarterly Review of Series A Financings and Series B and Later Round Financings: Third Quarter 2010</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.emergingenterprisecenterblog.com/venture-perspectives/november-2010-issue/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emergingenterprisecenterblog.com/venture-perspectives/november-2010-issue/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.emergingenterprisecenterblog.com/">Venture Perspectives</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:15:30 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>

      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>May 2010 Issue</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Quarterly Review of Venture Capital Financings: First Quarter 2010</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.emergingenterprisecenterblog.com/venture-perspectives/may-2010-issue/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emergingenterprisecenterblog.com/venture-perspectives/may-2010-issue/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.emergingenterprisecenterblog.com/">Venture Perspectives</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 18:13:47 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dave Broadwin</dc:creator>

      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>